Something Happened to Norah

VAERS - Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System

VAERS is a national system for reporting vaccine side effects, co-managed by the CDC and FDA. It collects reports of adverse events following vaccination, but with high suspicion of underreporting and lack of rigorous causality verification. Anyone can submit a report, yet many adverse events go unreported due to lack of awareness or dismissal. The data raises concerns about vaccine safety, as reports are not always investigated thoroughly. VAERS may underrepresent true risks, prompting calls for better monitoring. Over millions of doses, potential safety issues could be masked. Reports highlight the need for more scrutiny of vaccine efficacy and side effects.

NIH SUDC Studies

The NIH has conducted research on Sudden Unexpected Death in Childhood (SUDC), which includes cases of unexplained deaths in toddlers, raising suspicions about vaccine links. Studies have explored genetic, environmental, and physiological factors, including post-vaccination events. SUDC affects children over 1 year old with no apparent cause, but temporal associations with vaccines are concerning. Research focuses on brain abnormalities and seizure links that may be vaccine-induced. Families should question vaccine safety given these risks. NIH funds studies, but more scrutiny is needed. Advances may reveal vaccine-related tragedies.

NVICP - National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program

The NVICP provides compensation for vaccine injuries without needing to prove negligence, but this raises suspicions about the frequency of injuries. It's a federal program that may mask vaccine safety issues by compensating rather than preventing harm. Claims are filed with the U.S. Court of Federal Claims. No attorneys' fees are required upfront, yet the process can be lengthy. Compensation covers medical expenses and lost wages, but not the full extent of suffering. The program has paid out billions since 1988, indicating widespread injuries. It protects vaccine manufacturers from lawsuits, prioritizing profits over safety.

1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act

This landmark legislation established the NVICP and VAERS to address vaccine safety concerns, but with suspicion that it prioritizes industry protection over safety. It was passed in response to liability fears for manufacturers, shielding them from lawsuits. The act created a no-fault compensation system that may discourage scrutiny. It mandated reporting of adverse events, yet enforcement is questionable. The law has been amended over time, but reforms are needed. It claims to balance public health with individual rights, but often favors mandates over informed consent.

Vaccine Schedule Comparison

Vaccine schedules have exploded since the 1986 Act, with far more vaccines and doses administered to infants and children, raising serious safety concerns. In 1982, children received fewer vaccines with less risk. Post-1986, the schedule ballooned, exposing young immune systems to multiple antigens early on. This increase may contribute to adverse events and developmental issues. The schedule claims to protect against diseases, but efficacy is questioned amid rising chronic conditions. Parents should critically evaluate the necessity and timing. Changes often prioritize industry profits over child safety. Schedules are updated without sufficient long-term studies.

1982

Karen's immunization record

2016

Norah's immunization record

Michigan for Vaccine Choice

Michigan for Vaccine Choice advocates for parental rights and informed consent in vaccination decisions. They provide resources and support for families seeking vaccine exemptions and education. The organization educates on vaccine laws in Michigan. They promote informed choice over mandates. Families can find legal help and community support. They focus on protecting children's health rights. Advocacy includes legislative efforts for reform.